Wednesday, 11 November 2015
The Rise & Fall of CSA
We will take the Exaro sock puppet account's question: is the investigation of vip abuse really really important?
The more considered answer is, it depends -really, really it does!. It's important if you make money out of it like Exaro.
Joe blogs familial abuse is however no less valid than someone claiming abuse by ex PM, cabinet members, MPs, MI5/6, or any Royals, in fact it may be more valid since in general, statistically speaking it's more likely to be true.But it's unlikely to make any headlines, it will get far less resources,TW wont be involved and Exaro will make nothing from it.So you will probably never hear of it, unless you read a local paper
But then there is social media and its growth- right?
Some social media exhibit what might resemble a bacterial growth curve
Limited activity to begin with followed by an exponential growth, then a plateau or decline
This might graphically represent the csa movement on twitter ( note its important to make the distinction, twitter isn't THE movement, just a more vocal, & often misguided part of it)
Initially most saw a common goal, and little reason to be disagreeable.With time and the introduction of a few new members this initial harmony was replaced by a scramble to be top survivor - the Baker effect. Here the cause was not important, the individual was. If people moved away, or felt alienated , tough, as long as some had their own little clique, it didn't matter what happened to the rest, they were unimportant
This was facilitated by the 'sheep effect' which characterised many of the remaining 'moderates'.They simply pretended it wasn't happening, or at best made token gestures to try to patch things over. Bad call because clearly, it didn't and wont be effective. The Baker effect DEMANDS obedience and status, .The sheep - far too worried they may lose some standing, shut their mouths, buried their heads, and said nothing much. This is the extent of their commitment; they can only make vocal noises against a clear if somewhat caricature enemy, but not the enemy within.They are to use their own terminology, 'groomed' into submission- quite easily in most cases
Let me make this crystal clear in capitals, IF YOU CANT DEFEND IN ROBUST TERMS, A FELLOW SUPPORTER, SOMEONE THREATENED WITH LOSING HER EMPLOYMENT DUE TO HAVING A REASONABLE IF DIFFERENT VIEW FROM THE BAKER-LITES - THEN YOU ARENT WORTH MUCH, AND YOU SHOULD BE THOROUGHLY ASHAMED!!!
YOU ARE GROOMED INTO SUBMISSION, TOO FRIGHTENED OF LOSING YOUR LITTLE PLACE TO SAY A WORD -BLOCKING AND DISENGAGING TAKES MINIMAL EFFORT, IF YOU CAN'T EVEN DO THAT, WHY BOTHER
The Bakers of this world are some of the most vile, evil, manipulative, controlling little things you are ever likely to encounter - and I've met a few.She's a confirmed liar many times over from her own TL
She's not a survivor, she's an abuser who will at every other second tell you she's a victim, and try to squeeze as much sympathy out of any situation as she possibly can, by whatever means, and at whatever cost. As long as her needs are met, that's all that matters.Those characteristics are formed at an early age, they don't just appear one day.She's the sort to try to run over her victims, then reverse for another go, just to hear a few bones crunch on second try,before finally going home to complain someone had attacked her tyres
If you let your movement get hijacked, it's partly your fault for having no courage to defend it properly
The failing cases brought by Exaro, will damage csa more than any other single factor, and they brought them purely for money- nothing else.Even one of the claimants, now says his case shouldn't have been brought.The end result of these failures will be a change in the law of naming suspects prior to charging, and a growing public sense that such complainants are likely to be just fantasists, and liars - a cost that other genuine cases will have to bear.They are the ones that will be hurt most because others just didn't care, or are too gullible, or self centred to bother
Don't blame the media, blame yourselves in part for doing nothing other than ranting on in what has become some farcical pantomime.It's not the critics outside, you need to worry about, it's the unscrupulous ones inside, and the ditherers who allow them to flourish
Posted by socialmedianews at 21:27